If Dare County seeks and gets legislative approval for a 1% occupancy tax increase and chooses to direct that tax revenue away from the General (operating) Fund and into the Beach Nourishment Fund, it will close the door on that funding source for the future. The maximum occupancy tax allowed by the state is 6% and the county currently collects 5%, with one percent already allocated to beach nourishment and one percent allocated to the visitors bureau.
Meanwhile, the Dare County Board of Commissioners are about ready to impose a sizable tax increase on property owners during a time of economic hardship, unmatched in recent history.
Last week, County Manager, Bobby Outten, offered the board preliminary estimates during a budget workshop that shows the county faces a $4.1 million shortfall for the coming year. He asked for guidance in how to handle the problem.
Outten said it will take an increase of 3 cents (11%) in the ad valorem tax rate to balance next year's budget, which is predicted to receive $2.9 million less in revenues and may require $1.2 million more in requested expenses. And such a tax increase, without spending cuts, will only get the county through to the next fiscal year. Outten then pointed to additional, nondiscretionary debt for the year 2012 which is expected to result in more budget shortfalls.
For example, he said the first $1.1 million payment on the county's new multi-million dollar communications system and larger (state required) increases in employer contributions to the employee retirement program will be hitting the county in another year. Also, the projected $4.1 million shortfall does not take into account over $6 million that was cut from the current year budget, cuts that included almost $3 million in employee related benefits. Outten saw little chance any of those cuts could be reinstated, without sizable cuts in other areas, even if a tax increase is imposed for the coming year. (Note: County documents show that even though cuts were made in preparing the current 2010 year budget, it is estimated the county will overspend the budget by approximately $3.8 million this year. See chart below.)
Outten told the board that the county’s undesignated fund balance has shrunk to around 17% since 2006, placing it below the desired 19-21% level. He said it would take a minimum of $600,000 to get the balance back to a level that “rating agencies can tolerate.” “It will have repercussions for us in the financial market…when we are borrowing money...for example for communications system…if we don’t get our fund balance within the range we set”, he said.
In a separate and equally controversial area of county fiscal policy, the board of commissioners, with Warren Judge, Chairman, is expected to receive a resolution, at their May 3rd meeting, from the Dare County Shoreline Commission, with Warren Judge, Chairman, supporting a 1% increase in the county's occupancy tax rate in order to assist the Town of Nags Head with its planned $35 million beach nourishment program. A 1% increase in that revenue source nets about $3.25-3.75 million per year, almost enough to cover the county's general fund budget deficit for the coming year. Although allowable, there has been no reported talk, by any commissioner, of using that funding source to rescue the county from its current budget crisis. A 1% increase in the property tax rate would net about $1.7 million.
Judge, who has been a strong proponent of beach nourishment over the past ten years, would like to see new occupancy tax revenues used for that purpose. Recent talks, during shoreline commission meetings indicates Judge has the backing of at least a majority of his board, who also wants to see sand pumped onto the beaches.
If Dare County seeks and gets legislative approval for the occupancy tax increase and chooses to direct budget saving revenues away from the general fund and into the beach nourishment fund, it will close the door on that funding source for anytime in the future. The maximum occupancy tax allowed by the state is 6% and the county currently collects 5%, with one percent already allocated to beach nourishment and one percent allocated to the visitors bureau.
The two hour workshop presentation was solemn, detailed and brought few smiles to the faces of the county commissioners.
"I for one, don’t want to see any tax increase," said commissioner Jack Shea.
"I have a real problem with cutting medical care benefits in this county," said commissioner Allen Burrus, referring to comments that the county med-helicopter was due for major overhaul in two years.
While not advocating such action, Outten offered the example that 41 higher level positions in county government, with associated benefits would about equal the expected $4.1 million deficit. The county hires about 740 employees. He also told the board that eliminating 16 lower-level positions that are currently vacant would save the county about $650,000 per year.
"I'm a republican and I don't like any kind of taxes, but we can't cut 41 jobs and put people out on the streets at a time when so many other people are out of work”, said commissioner Mike Johnson, adding, “there is no way the economy is going to be back and bail us out next year.”
By the end of the budget workshop, all commissioners agreed they wanted to see a new budget show some “shrinkage” in county spending to complement what is sure to be a tax increase for the coming year. It was clear that while Outten was asking for “guidance” from the board, the board was also asking him to help them find some way to make a dire situation more palatable to citizens in the county. “You’re the county manager,” said one commissioner during the meeting.
To view a video of the entire budget workshop, go to http://www.darenc.com/video/ and click on April 19th Budget Workshop. A second workshop is planned for April 27th, afterwhich Outten hopes to present his final budget proposal to the board on May 17th, a week later than normal.
Footnote: It was also noted during the workshop that talk is, the towns of Nags Head and Southern Shores are likely to present as much as two cent ad valorem tax increases in their upcoming budget proposals.
=========================================================================
17 comments:
These guys are going to have to get together and figure out what expenses are primarily OPTIONAL - like risky, unneeded sand - and what expenses are going to get them RIPPED A NEW ONE by voters if they cut them (and instead pump sand).
I can't imagine any of these Commissioners could look any of their neighbors in the eye if they use any tax increase to cater to real estate greed, rather than help their neighbors get through these rough times.
I put myself in their shoes, and just could not face my family or kids or friends or people at work if I did that.
Just like our President, they know they are screwed for the next election(s) and are willing to sacrifice themselves for what they want right now.
They're personal interests (Oceanfront Properties) come first, as they always have.
Thanks Ray for keep us informed! I love the picture of Judge - he's looking a bit flustered these days.
I would like to know what Bobby Outten's views are on Beach Nourishment. I wonder if he's be willing to take a cut in his salary to help balance the budget??????
Maybe Mr. Outten can give up one of his over $100,000 salaries he receives from the county. How about cutting all these social service programs. Families and Churches need to step up, not the government, to help our neighbors in need.
We cut some top salaries(you've covered the excess there) and then the lower county positions being cut will allow county offices to move to the first ginormous government building(thought Repubs wanted SMALL gov't?) Then we could rent space in the 2nd of the three brick elephants. Maybe hold conventions there, Renee.
Thanks for the good job you do, Ray!
my current county taxes on an oceanfront beach box are $643.31 a year. A 3 cent or 11% county tax increase would raise my annual taxes to a whopping $713.31. on a national level these rates are relatively low. i will gladly pay the additional $70 a year to maintain the services that the county of dare provides.
I would pay more taxes to keep some services going (like recycling centers on Hatteras Island). The only problem is giving them (county commissioners and friends) more money is a vote of approval for all the dumb things they spent money on in the past.
I think the solution is to cut all County salarys across the board. The private sector has certanily experienced this, why not county employees.
To: Anonymous @ April 26, 2010 2:48 PM
County Employees have felt the crunch of the economy.Last year teachers were furloughed and lost some benefits like longevity pay; county employees had benefits cut or reduced, including co pays and deductibles on medical insurances.
So let's continue to take more from those who serve us, EMS, Medflight, Deputies and Teachers and throw our hard earned money into the wind. That's what we'd be doing for beach nourishment, throwing our money into the wind!
I am checking the COA schedule to see if Commissioner Judge is teaching the class on back door politics (101), subtitled: how to get taxpayers to pay for your oceanfront business(s) and bankrupt the county at the same time.
Let Them Eat Cake.
There are many dedicated county employees that can barely get by on what they make now. To talk of beach nourishment and cutting the jobs or pay of these people is wrong.
When these things go to Raleigh, do men like Spears and Basnight ever stop and ask…
Why is Dare County asking for a tax increase solely to experiment with new sand? – and they also have to borrow a ton of money? – but at the same time their citizens are getting taxed more and really hurting? – and the peoples’ services like EMS/schools/police/fire are already sliced apart due to earlier cuts?
Do our state people connect dots like that? Do they ask those questions?
Please note the bottom line in the chart: the county will be $27 million IN THE BLACK as of the end of the fiscal year. Hard times = less tax collections = need to use some of the cushion, which is maintained for exactly this purpose. Gripe if you want about individual projects, but don't accuse the county government of bad faith budgeting or accounting.
Allan,
You used the term, "bad faith budgeting or accounting" in your comments. Perhaps you can explain to our readers what you meant by that. We sure don't know. Thanks.
County employees' pay and benefits have never been on part with the towns, and the employees took a tremendous hit last year. Further cuts would be a slap in the face, and horrendously unfair. For "anonymous" to suggest an across- the-board pay decrease is really quite idiotic. But, that is probably precisely what these moron commissioners will do. They care NOTHING for dedicated and hard-working county employees, while pet projects (like dog parks) and WASTEFUL SPENDING (like unnecessary million dollar radio systems) go on unchallenged. I am disgusted with this board, and I hope all Dare County voters feel equally infuriated.
Enjoy your exorbitant salary, Mr. Outten. How much of IT will be furloughed? Each county employee will probably have to eat close to a 3% cut. Will you likewise give up $6,000 of your salary?
Post a Comment